Wednesday, October 27, 2010

A Million Hits in .02 Seconds

      I'm not really sure what the actual "Laws of Attraction" means. I'm not going to bother to Google it or Bing it or anything it.Who needs a million hits in .02 seconds?

     I'll be the first to admit I Google and Bing everything. When I say everything, I mean "everything". Just today I Googled "why does my dog pace the floor all day?" I won't bore you with the million hits that only took .02 seconds to retrieve from Google but I will tell you what happened when I hit the enter key after I asked the question to Google. I looked at the screen and I said to myself "I really Googled that?" Sure enough, I "really" did.

     Back in the day, our parents didn't have Google or Bing to use, they used their common sense, yet today we use a place in space created by someone we don't know, never met, and haven't questioned their ability to give true accurate meaning. Interesting, to think we trust sources we can't validate ourselves. If more and more sources copy each other off the internet we're going to find the same answers to the same questions which will validate the meaning to the certain subject we're researching. So does that make our findings valid? Who am I to question? I question everything which is why I send my questions to Google. It's nice to know I can get a million answers in .02 seconds. I've been asking questions all my life and never seem to get an answer. Maybe I should Google "why don't I ever get answers to my questions?" I'm sure the answers will be quite attractive.


Until Next Time,
Much Love,
Nikki
The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes
O Holy Night (CD/DVD)
The 7th Victim

Monday, October 25, 2010

Why I am Going To Boycott Music Artists

In a recent story published by allaccess.com today.

THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS RADIO BOARD OF DIRECTORS has voted in favor of presenting musicFIRST representatives a legislative "Term Sheet" designed to resolve the longstanding performance fee issue. The Radio Board conditioned their support for today's Term Sheet on the understanding that all provisions would remain part of any legislative package. TODAY's vote is subject to ratification by the NAB JOINT BOARD OF DIRECTORS, which will meet TUESDAY afternoon.

"NAB remains 100% opposed to performance fee legislation pending in Congress," said NAB Radio Board Chair CAROLINE BEASLEY, CFO of FLORIDA-based BEASLEY BROADCAST GROUP. "However, in a good faith effort to resolve this issue in the best interests of both radio and the music industry, we have endorsed a solution ensuring that broadcasters have a foothold in digital platforms of tomorrow."

The Term Sheet represents a path forward for radio broadcasters and musicFirst to resolve this contentious issue in a manner that is fair and equitable to both sides.

"Today's endorsement includes provisions that are essential to the future of free and local radio, and we're hopeful that the musicFIRST Coalition finds it in their best interest to say 'yes' to this proposal," BEASLEY said.

Under language included in the Term Sheet, music-playing terrestrial radio stations would agree to pay a limited performance fee, which would be set at between 0.25% and one percent of a station's net revenue, depending on a provision related to the penetration of radio-activated mobile phones in the U.S. Today's endorsement from the NAB Radio Board was made with the understanding that any legislative resolution supported by NAB must include the following:

-- Permanent removal of the Copyright Royalty Board from rate-setting of transmissions of terrestrial on-air music or Internet streaming;

-- Resolution of the "AFTRA issue" outside of the legislative process by the musicFIRST coalition that would facilitate simulcast of over-the-air radio commercials on the Internet;

-- musicFIRST's acknowledgment and recognition of the unparalleled promotional value of terrestrial radio airplay;

-- Simplified airplay reporting requirements similar to the model used by ASCAP/BMI;

-- Congressionally-mandated radio-activated chips in mobile devices such as cell phones and BLACKBERRY smartphones, with an acceptable phase-in period and inclusion of HD Radio chips when economically feasible. If a legislative mandate (which musicFirst has agreed to support) becomes initially unattainable, radio broadcasters would agree to an initial performance fee payment of .25% of net industry revenue. Under this scenario, the performance fee would mirror the actual percentage of radio-activated mobile phones in the United States. Once market penetration of radio-activated mobile devices reaches and maintains a level of 75 percent of all mobile devices, broadcasters agree to pay the full one percent terrestrial transmission performance fee.

-- Assuming a successful mandate of radio-activated chips in mobile devices, streaming rates that broadcasters pay for simulcasts, webcasts and other non-terrestrial transmissions of music through 2016 would be reduced. In the event that a legislative mandate for radio chips in mobile devices is not achieved, the streaming rate reduction would not take effect until 50 percent of mobile phones have radio chips;

The Term Sheet provides accommodations for small radio station operators, noncommercial stations, religious broadcasters and incidental uses of music by news/talk and sports stations.

The Term Sheet also envisions that both the radio and music industry will work cooperatively to offer consumers more and better ways to listen to music.

The Radio Board's action is a culmination of more than a year of discussions and dialogue between radio executives, the NAB and its membership, musicFIRST, and key leaders in Congress. It comes after more than 260 members of the U.S. House of Representatives and 27 members of the U.S. Senate expressed bipartisan opposition to pending Performance Rights Act legislation that was passed out of two committees in Congress last year.

"From a position of strength, we have fashioned a Term Sheet for resolving the performance fee issue that in the long run is acceptable for radio," said NAB Joint Board Chairman STEVE NEWBERRY, President and CEO of KENTUCKY-based COMMONWEALTH BROADCASTING. "No broadcaster that I know relishes paying a new fee, but the terms of this agreement provide badly needed certainty for our business to move forward, and the positives of this accord far out-weigh the negatives."

NAB President and CEO GORDON SMITH said the Term Sheet "represents a path forward for radio broadcasters and musicFirst to resolve this contentious issue in a manner that is fair and equitable to both sides. Radio stations, artists and the record labels have more commonalities than differences, and adoption of legislation that reflects this Term Sheet will provide a framework for untold new revenue opportunities for both sides. We look forward to working with musicFIRST and its allies for swift legislative adoption of this entire package of initiatives that will help our businesses flourish in the digital age."


Get the rest of the story here:
Terms To Be Presented To musicFIRST Coalition | NAB RADIO BOARD News | AllAccess.com

Until Next Time,
Much Love,
Nikki

PS. Follow me on Facebook to see the comments!

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Turn The Stereotyping Off!

There is so much in the current news about stereotyping and the damage it creates to those who practice the art of stereotyping. I call it an "Art" because it's not politically correct to stereotype, so instead we justify it by saying "it's just my opinion". As in the stories below, you can see these comments are by people in the middle who get paid to give their "opinions".

      Keep in mind, these people are in the mass media circut who have the power to influence many at the same time. Last week on the show "The View" the hosts had Bill O'Reilly on as a guest. They were all talking about the mosque being built at Ground Zero in New York City. Some of the hosts felt it's matter of a "right" to build it there and the other hosts felt like it was inappropriate to have it built it there. Bill O'Reilly came on the show as a guest to voice his opinion on the matter and his "stereotypical" comment about the Muslims caused two of the hosts to walk of the show in the middle of a live taping. You can see the video here:  The View with Bill O'Reilly  . Bill O'Reilly goes on to say it was "The Muslims" who killed us on 9/11" So in other words he stereotyped all Muslims as terrorists. I'm sure if you ask him, his comment will be "it's just my opinion" like he says in the video. You can see the discussion on what Bill O'Reilly  said here: Joy Baher Show Addresses Bill O'Reilly

      Speaking of Muslims, there is a story in the NPR news today about terminating the contract of a longtime news analyst Juan Williams. They terminated his contract based on his remarks he made about Muslims on the Fox News Channel with Bill O'Reilly. This is what he said on the O'Reilly Factor to Bill O'Reilly.
                       "Look, Bill, I'm not a bigot. You know the kind of books I've written about the civil rights movement in this
                        country. But when I get on the plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you
                        know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous."
                       (Folkenflik, 2010).
     My question is, whatever happened to fair reporting as journalists?

     Now, we have even more news about stereotyping in this country.  How about the military's plan on what they plan on doing to allow Gay's in the military? How stereotypical can you get? As a member of the Air Force, let me tell you; I know a lot of gay people in the military and not once has their sexual preference hindered their ability to perform their duties in the military. Many of the "gay people" in the military were better workers than the "Straight " members. "Pentagon officials told NBC News on Thursday the military will immediately resume enforcement of the 1993 "don't ask, don't tell" rule. The policy says gay's may serve but only if they keep secret their sexual orientation"(NBC, 2010) . Personally, I find it ironic that the same freedom our military members fight for is the same freedom being taken away from them.

     Basically, we can see just by these three examples alone how detrimental this is to someone. It can end jobs at it did with the NPR correspondent, it can create frustrations as it did in the show "The View" and it can also alienate people like the story about the "gay's" in the military. Sad to think we live a world where people have nothing better to do then to pass judgment on others. In some cases, it takes an act of congress literally to prove you're just as valuable as some one who is different than you.



Until Next Time,
Much Love,
Nikki
Visit My On Line Store Here

Translate